Digital Set-Top Boxes; A Defect.

The Australian government has once again initiated another soon-to-be bungled scheme: ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the set-top box saga.

Following the release of the annual government Budget last month, Julia Gillard and her army of poisoning pollies confirmed that over $300 million dollars of tax-payer money will be spent on the installation and connection of digital set top boxes for Australian pensioners.


However, the scheme is proving to be nothing but an enormous waste of time with a matter of ‘too much dollars, not enough sense’ in the eyes of the Australian media.

Government supplied set-top boxes are proving to be unreliable.

 Photo by avlxyz

Melbourne’s Herald Sun yesterday reported many Mildura residents were experiencing deficiencies and technical issues with their supplied set-top boxes, with a lengthy list of complaints including unwatchable television, thanks to dodgy reception signals, software malfunctions and equipment breakdowns.

ABC news also recently reported the details of the rollout, with communications minister Stephen Conroy backing the scheme.

“Someone will come and install it and also instruct them in how to use it," he said.

Well, Mr. Conroy, that may be good and jolly, but how can our pensioning parents and grandparents benefit from a crash course in operating the botchy boxes if the digital equipment doesn’t work in a serenely efficient and reliable manner?

From these recent reports of backlash and dissatisfaction, it is clear that the Australian government has succeeded in stupidity. Again.

Bells of previous government disasters (the highly criticised Home Insulation scheme, anyone?) should be ringing in the ears and eyes of our leaders.

The sheer cost of the installing component of the scheme is enough to make one scream. If the costs were to be broken down, the payouts alone to the sub-contracting companies who carry out installation, on top of the cost of the actual boxes, is a complete joke and an utter waste of time.

If the Gillard government wanted to aim for efficiency and long-term success, then surely the supply of digital televisions themselves would have been a better answer to our technological era, instead of the band-aid solution that is currently being rolled out.

While Wayne Swan explained to Channel Nine “We don't want to leave those pensioners in the dark,” It is unfortunately clear that they already have been left in the dark.

Regional Australia has once again been whacked in the face, being left in the dark as government guinea pigs, without a functioning telly to keep them warm and informed each night.

Dancing With The Stars: Not So Dazzling At 11

Photo grab from Dancing With The Stars website.

Sunday night’s premiere of Dancing With The Stars debuted with a big bang – with Brynne Edelsten running the show of superficial sausages.

With a new host, a new judge and a new set of silly c-grade celebrities, season eleven of Channel Seven’s popular reality show has unfortunately, already proved to be the current rating season’s token winner.

Mediaspy.com reported a national audience of over 1.5 million. But of those 1.5 million watchers, I wonder who still takes the show’s entertainment values seriously?

As soon as Melbourne socialite Brynne Edelston stepped up on stage, the show’s monopoly value took a bittersweet spin, for the better. With her bouncy blonde hair, big bosoms and 67-year-old husband in tow, judges labeled her routine as a “bedazzled sack of potatoes”.

Now, while a little bit of constructive criticism isn’t bad, ratings or not, the catty comment made by new judge Josh Horner, I think, certainly supports her stance as an accepted airhead.

I mean, who is Brynne Edelston? What has she done to allow the media to validate her as a celebrity? (Well, enough of a celebrity to get an invitation to shimmy her derrière on Dancing With The Stars?)

Marrying Medical entrepreneur and overall old man Geoffrey Edelston was a good start, sure. So was rocking up to 2009’s Brownlow Medal wearing nothing but a sheer, long lined shirt and protruding push-up bra doused with silver diamanté’s. But, apart from that, there really isn’t much else, besides being a tabloid trend for marrying a man 40 years her senior.

The Herald Sun reported that during Sunday night’s telecast, dimwitted Green Room interviewer, Sonia Kruger, regretted the comedic comment that implied the marriage was akin to a father-daughter relationship.

Regretted the comment that set social networking site Twitter into overdrive with a flurry of outraged hash tags in Edelsten’s defence.

Regretted what most of Melbourne – and Australia – was thinking.

“Good to see you have a good relationship with your dad,” she quipped.

Stupid Sonia spoke accidental words – and ratings – of gold.

The “bedazzled sack of potatoes” has finally been dished up what she deserves; a slap on the wrist for being a gold digging, media mole with no real accreditation or known work ethic, and a newly provided vote of sympathy from online Tweeters, who, put simply, cannot see that Seven’s primetime hit is now a waste of broadcasted space and an embarrassment to what was previously, quality Sunday night television.